![]() That compensation will always be in the loop no matter what we do? It is not the stone age anymore, and once you get a real grip on what the room is doing to your system, well for me at least, things like cables and all the other minutiae *most* audiophiles concentrate on become insignificant. And for a computer idiot like me, to be able to 'master' REW certainly says something. How long a go was it that this sort of stuff was hideously expensive and beyond the reach of mere mortals like myself? Probably not even ten years ago. ![]() This is one area that lot of audiophiles simply don't know what they are missing. After all the deqx makes an inverse of the measurement, so the mic inaccuracy is automatically included in that.ĭunno about the Tact software, but the deqx software is a bit 'clunky' when I want to make quick measurements for adjusting levels and whatnot (gotta go thru wizrds and stuff) so I just whip the mic out of the deqx and throw it into the mixer then use REW. When for example I use the mic to correct with the deqx, I don't even bother with loading the cal file. Re using a cal file, I guess it depends on what you want. ![]() Already had the mic (from the deqx) so all that was needed for REW was a mic pre, can pick them up for fifty bucks or so. ![]() I use the deqx and it's software, and in addition use REW. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |